Open to current graduate students and faculty. Advanced undergraduates and others interested in participating should contact dstrobach@lumenchristi.org. This event is in-person only. All registrants will receive copies of the selected readings, which should be read in advance of the class. An optional wine and cheese reception will follow.
This event is made possible through the support of ‘In Lumine: Supporting the Catholic Intellectual Tradition on Campuses Nationwide’ (Grant #62372) from the John Templeton Foundation.
Thomas Aquinas distinguishes between two kinds of moral virtue: acquired moral virtues, which are cultivated though one’s power and via one’s own repeated good acts, and infused moral virtues, which are bestowed on man directly by God in the moment of baptism. The distinction between these two types of virtue is the focus of this master class. The goal will be to understand how Aquinas understands the difference between the two types of virtue: the sources from which each spring, the ways in which the acts of each differ, and whether and to what extent he believes the two different types of virtue interact.
The first 15 registrants will receive a copy of Knobel’s book, Aquinas and the Infused Moral Virtues.
Readings:
Disputed Questions on the Virtues (Preferably the Atkins translation):
◊ Disputed Question on the Virtues in General a.8-11; (48 pages)
Summa Theologiae (Preferably Alfred Freddoso’s translation, available online at https://www3.nd.edu/~afreddos/summa-translation/TOC.htm)
◊ Prima Secundae q.61 a.5, 62, 63, 68 (22 pages total)
Aquinas and the Infused Moral Virtues
◊ Chapter 6 (30 pages)
Both the required and recommended readings will be distributed to participants via Dropbox. If you prefer, you can pick up a printout of the readings at Gavin House (1220 E. 58th Street) Mon-Fri, 10am-4pm once they are ready. Please email David Strobach at dstrobach@lumenchristi.org to let us know you are coming.
Discussion Questions:
◊ Conceptually, what seem to be the most important differences between the infused and acquired virtues? Aquinas repeatedly speaks of virtues as “proceeding from principles,” and of the different “seeds” of infused and acquired virtue, respectively. What is meant by the language of “principle” and “seed,” and how are those notions important in Aquinas’s understanding of infused and/or acquired virtue? What is meant by the claim that the two types of virtue differ in “species”? What role does the difference in the “end” that each virtue is ordered to play, and how important is it?
◊ a.10 ad.4 of the Disputed Question on the Virtues in General and q.61 a.5 of the Prima Secundae are two of the very few texts where Aquinas says anything at all about the relationship between the infused and acquired virtues. What do these texts imply, and is what each text implies the same or different?
◊ Given Aquinas’s insistence that only the infused virtues order us to supernatural beatitude, can it ever make sense on his account to pursue only acquired virtue?
Schedule:
11:30-12:00 | Optional pre-event lunch
12:00-1:20 | Session 1
1:20-1:40 | Coffee break
1:40-3:00 | Session 2
3:00-3:30 | Reception
