Master Class on "Clashing over Mysticism: Bathasar and Rahner"

Apr 8, 2022
Gavin House
1220 E 58th St.
Chicago, IL 60637
Back to Events

Stephen Fields, SJGeorgetown University


Due to circumstances outside our control, this event has been canceled. We hope to schedule events with Fr. Fields in future quarters.



Open to current students and faculty. Others interested in participating should contact us. Registrants will recieve copies of the prepared reading.

In an era of outstanding theologians who made the teachings of Vatican II possible, Hans Urs von Balthasar (1905-88) and Karl Rahner (1904-84) emerge as titans. Both were German speaking: Rahner came from Baden and Balthasar from Switzerland. Rahner died as a Jesuit, having taught in Innsbruck, Munich, and Muenster. Balthasar left the order in mid-life to serve as chaplain to a secular institute in Basel.  Both were prolific writers. Rahner’s chief works are Spirit in the World (1957), a study of Aquinas’s theory of knowledge; Hearer of the Word (1941), a study in Christian philosophy of religion; Foundations of Christian Faith (1976), a systematic theology of Catholicism; and the renowned Theological Investigations (1954- 84), sixteen volumes on a wide range of topics. Balthasar produced, among other works, a renowned trilogy, each multi-volumed: The Glory of the Lord: A Theological Aesthetics (1961-67); Theo-Drama (1973-83); and Theo-Logic (1985-87). I would also mention his influential Theology of Karl Barth (1951).

Although they began their careers as collaborators, especially in reconceiving nature and grace, they ended as antagonists over theological method. Our Master Class will peer into their differences by reading their interpretations of the mystical theology of St. Bonaventure, the thirteen- century Seraphic Doctor. Rahner published his study in 1933 in Revue d’ascétique et de mystique;Balthasar published his in 1961 in the first volume of Glory of the Lord. I will argue that they develop remarkably contrasting views of Bonaventure, because they hold remarkably contrasting views on a broader issue. It concerns the impact of the act of faith on the human person’s faculties.

Our two sessions, each of an hour separated by a break, will deal first with Rahner’s article, then with Balthasar’s, then with the broader issue.



  1. Balthasar, Hans Urs von. "Bonaventure." In Seeing the Form. Glory of the Lord 2. Trans. Andrew Louth et al. San Francisco: Ignatius, 1984: 260-362, at 306-26. Originally as above.

  2. Rahner, Karl. "The Doctrine of the ‘Spiritual Senses’ in the Middle Ages." In Theological Investigations 16. Trans. David Morland, OSB. New York: Crossroad, 1983: 104-34. Originally as above.

  3. Fields, Stephen. "Balthasar and Rahner on the Spiritual Senses." Theological Studies 57 (1996): 224-41 (selections).


Questions to Guide the Readings:

  1. How does each thinker see Bonaventure conceiving the relation between soul and body in the human person?

  2. How does each thinker see Bonaventure conceiving the ‘spiritual senses’?

  3. According to each thinker, what is the Object of the spiritual senses?

  4. According to each thinker, what are the important spiritual senses? Why?

  5. How does each thinker interpret Bonaventure’s mysticism as "learned ignorance"?

  6. In your opinion, does Rahner’s interpretation obviate Christ? Does Balthasar’s interpretation finally give any importance to mysticism in Christianity?


Stephen Fields, S.J. is Hackett Family Professor of Theology at Georgetown University, where he has taught since 1993. A Jesuit priest and scholar, he holds a PhD from Yale in the philosophy of religion and an STL in fundamental theology from the Weston School of Theology (now the School of Theology and Ministry, Boston College). He has written Being As Symbol: On the Origins and Development of Karl Rahner’s Metaphysics (2001) and Analogies of Transcendence: An Essay on Nature, Grace and Modernity (2016).  Recently he edited a volume of essays on the thought of Benedict XVI (Nova et Vetera, August 2017).  His scholarly articles treat such topics as Hans Urs von Balthasar, John Henry Newman, transcendental Thomism, and the Trinity, as well as Catholicism’s relation to liberalism, to ‘postmodernism,’ and to the contemporary university. He has been a long-time friend and collaborator of the Lumen Christi Institute. His undergraduate students elected him as the twelfth recipient of the Dorothy M. Brown Award for excellence in teaching. He now directs the Lumen Christi Institute’s annual summer seminar for graduate students on John Henry Newman.